Always URL Encode your Cookies

One of the things that you tend to forget about when dealing with websites that typically only cater to English-speaking visitors is how to properly deal with Unicode throughout the site. It turns out that some browsers handle Unicode support in different sections of the browser differently.

For instance, it turns out that when you want to store Unicode data as the value in a cookie, your success may vary across browsers. When I tested this with the Euro symbol, €, it worked without a hitch in Chrome, Safari, and Internet Explorer. However, in Firefox, it was stored as an empty string. In order to correct the issue, you can use encodeURI() on the Unicode character to get the ASCII version of the Unicode character, and then store that in the cookie. Fortunately, this seems to work without issue across all of the major browsers.

Tags:
comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

Avoid jQuery.bind()

When chasing down performance issues, you never know what kind of problems you will find. I was looking for something that would cause jitter when scrolling on the page. After looking at the custom code that runs on every scroll event, I still had not found a reason for the jitter. Looking at the JavaScript CPU profile when scrolling in Chrome showed that there was an overwhelming majority of the time spent in a function in the Prototype JS library.

Read More

Mobile Web Development Is the New Internet Explorer 6

Developing a website that works well across devices and browsers is an excersize in playing Whack-A-Mole. Once you get one browser working on a desktop browser, you go to the next browser and find that not everything works the same way. In 2014, it seems that there aren’t that many differences in functionality between desktop browsers, but that all changes once you start making a responsive website that must handle mobile devices as well as it does desktop browsers.

Read More

Improve jQuery Performance With $().addClass()

When looking at things that make a website seem sluggish, you might assume that the most popular JavaScript framework out there always does things in the most efficient manner. However, as I have found, jQuery does not always produce the best performance due to it having to support many different browsers with version 1.x. As a general rule, instead of setting CSS attributes directly on the selected nodes, I prefer to instead add and remove classes on those nodes instead, as it seems to perform much better.

Read More