Cursor

Cursor Automations and the Shift from Prompting to Policy

One of the most current product shifts in AI development tooling is Cursor Automations, which turns coding agents into event-driven workflows instead of one-off assistants. The feature can trigger work from commits, Slack messages, timers, and operational events, then route the agent through review, checks, and deployment-style steps with humans only stepping in at key points.

That may sound like just another convenience layer. It is not. It reflects a deeper change in how teams are thinking about AI tooling.

Cursor in JetBrains and the End of IDE Lock-In

One of the quietest but most important developer-tooling stories of March 2026 is that Cursor is now available directly inside JetBrains IDEs through the Agent Client Protocol, or ACP, registry.

At first glance, this looks like a convenience feature. Cursor users can keep their preferred agent while staying in IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, or WebStorm. JetBrains users get access to a popular agentic workflow without switching editors. Nice, but not transformative.

Cursor vs. Copilot in 2026: What Actually Matters for Your Team

By 2026 the AI coding tool war is a fixture of tech news. Cursor—the AI-native editor from a handful of MIT grads—has reached a $29.3B valuation and around $1B annualized revenue in under two years. GitHub Copilot has crossed 20 million users and sits inside most of the Fortune 100. The comparison pieces write themselves: Cursor vs. Copilot on features, price, workflow. But for teams that have adopted one or both and still don’t see clear performance benefits, the lesson from 2026 isn’t “pick the winning tool.” It’s that the tool is often the wrong place to look.